Systematic development of lectin conjugated microspheres for nose-to-brain delivery of rivastigmine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

The current study focuses on development of nasal mucoadhesive microspheres for nose-to-brain delivery of rivastigmine for Alzheimer treatment. A systematic development was employed for optimization of the formulation and process parameters influential on the quality attributes of the microspheres. The risk assessment study revealed major influence of the polymer concentration (ethylcellulose: chitosan), the concentration of surfactant solution (polyvinyl alcohol), and stirring speed as the critical factors for optimization of the microspheres. These factors were systematically optimized using Box-Behnken design and microspheres were evaluated for the particle size, entrapment efficiency, and in vitro drug release as the response variables. The optimized microspheres containing 4.4% wt/vol polymers, 1% wt/vol surfactant, and stirring speed at 1500 rpm showed particle size of 19.9 µm, entrapment efficiency of 77.8%, and drug release parameters as T80% of 7.3 h. The surface modification of microspheres was performed with lectin by carbodiimide activation reaction and confirmed by difference in surface charge before and after chemical functionalization by zeta potential measurement which was found to be - 25.7 mV and 20.5 mV, respectively. Ex vivo study for bioadhesion strength evaluation on goat nasal mucosa indicated a significant difference (p < 0.001) between the plain (29%) and lectin functionalized microspheres (64%). In vivo behavioral and biochemical studies in the rats treated with lectin functionalized microspheres showed markedly better memory-retention vis-à-vis test and pure drug solution treated rats (p < 0.001). In a nutshell, the present studies showed successful development of nasal microspheres for enhanced brain delivery of rivastigmine for Alzheimer's treatment.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of nasal liposome and nanoparticle based rivastigmine formulations in acute and chronic models of Alzheimer's disease.

With the increasing aging population and progressive nature of the disease, Alzheimer's disease (AD) poses to be an oncoming epidemic with limited therapeutic strategies. It is characterized by memory loss, behavioral instability, impaired cognitive function, predominantly, cognitive inability manifested due to the accumulation of ß-amyloid, with malfunctioned cholinergic system. Rivastigmine, a reversible dual cholinesterase inhibitor, is a more tolerable and widely used choice of drug for AD. However, rivastigmine being hydrophilic and undergoing the first-pass metabolism exhibits low CNS bioavailability. Nanoformulations including liposomes and PLGA nanoparticles can encapsulate hydrophilic drugs and deliver them efficiently to the brain. Besides, the nasal route is receiving considerable attention recently, due to its direct access to the brain. Therefore, the present study attempts to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of nasal liposomal and PLGA nanoparticle formulations of rivastigmine in acute scopolamine-induced amnesia and chronic colchicine induced cognitive dysfunction animal models, and validate the best formulation by employing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling. Nasal liposomal rivastigmine formulation showed the best pharmacokinetic features with rapid onset of action (Tmax = 5 min), higher Cmax (1489.5 ± 620.71), enhanced systemic bioavailability (F = 118.65 ± 23.54; AUC = 35,921.75 ± 9559.46), increased half-life (30.92 ± 8.38 min), and reduced clearance rate (Kel (1/min) = 0.0224 ± 0.006) compared to oral rivastigmine (Tmax = 15 min; Cmax = 56.29 ± 27.05; F = 4.39 ± 1.82; AUC = 1663.79 ± 813.54; t1/2 = 13.48 ± 5.79; Kel (1/min) = 0.0514 ± 0.023). Further, the liposomal formulation significantly rescued the memory deficit induced by scopolamine as well as colchicine superior to other formulations as assessed in Morris water maze and passive avoidance tasks. PK-PD modeling demonstrated a strong correlation between the pharmacokinetic parameters and acetylcholinesterase inhibition of liposomal formulation.

The Efficacy of Transdermal Rivastigmine in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease with Concomitant Small Vessel Cerebrovascular Disease: Findings from an Open-Label Study.

BACKGROUND: Rivastigmine is used to treat cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease (AD); however, the efficacy of Rivastigmine in patients with AD and concomitant small vessel cerebrovascular disease (svCVD) remains unclear. We investigated the effectiveness of Rivastigmine Patch in patients with AD and svCVD. METHODS: In this open-label study, 100 patients with AD and MRI confirmed svCVD received 9.5mg/24 hours Rivastigmine transdermal treatment for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was global cognition indexed using the ADAS-Cog. Secondary outcomes included clinical-rated impression of change (indexed using (ADCS-CGIC), activities of daily living (indexed using ADCS-ADL) and side effects. RESULTS: Overall, performance on the ADAS-Cog after 24 weeks deteriorated by 1.78 (SD = 5.29) points. Fifty-two percent of the sample demonstrated improvement or remained stable, while 48% demonstrated worsening of ADAS-Cog scores. Of the 52%, significant improvement (2 or more-point decline) on the ADAS-Cog was observed in 25% of the sample, with a mean change of -5.08 (SD = 3.11). A decline on the ADAS-Cog was observed in 48% of the sample, with a mean change of 6 (SD = 2.98) points. Cognitive outcome did not interact with severity of svCVD. ADCS-ADL scores remained stable from baseline to week 24 and ADCS-CGIC reports indicated that 81% of the patients remained stable after treatment. Side effects were reported by 16% of the patients, with contact dermatitis being the most common. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that Rivastigmine may have a role in the management of patients having AD and concomitant mild-severe svCVD, with minimal side effects.

Design, development and in-vitro/in-vivo evaluation of intranasally delivered Rivastigmine and N-Acetyl Cysteine loaded bifunctional niosomes for applications in combinative treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

The present investigation explores the potential of novel dual drug-loaded niosomes for nasal delivery of Rivastigmine (RIV) and N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) to the brain. The dual niosomes showed a particle size of 162.4 nm and % entrapment efficiencies of 97.7% for RIV and 85.9% for NAC. The niosomes were statistically validated using Box-Behnken experimental design (BBD) with good significance. Ultrastructural and chemical characterization of the niosomes using various analytical techniques like Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showcased drug-excipient compatibility and robust stability of 6 months in a liquid state at 4-8 °C. The dual drug-loaded niosomes showed a sustained drug release pattern up to 2 days. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and DPPH (1, 1-diphenyl-2- picrylhydrazyl) enzyme inhibition assays showed a better combinative effect than the free drug solutions. A 2-day nasal permeation proved the effectiveness and biocompatibility of the niosomes. In-vivo pharmacokinetic and organ biodistribution studies revealed a better drug profile and greater distribution of the niosomes in the brain compared to other organs, thereby indicating a direct nose-to-brain delivery of the niosomes.

Cholinesterase inhibitors for vascular dementia and other vascular cognitive impairments: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) describes a broad spectrum of cognitive impairments caused by cerebrovascular disease, ranging from mild cognitive impairment to dementia. There are currently no pharmacological treatments recommended for improving either cognition or function in people with VCI. Three cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine) are licenced for the treatment of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. They are thought to work by compensating for reduced cholinergic neurotransmission, which is also a feature of VCI. Through pairwise comparisons with placebo and a network meta-analysis, we sought to determine whether these medications are effective in VCI and whether there are differences between them with regard to efficacy or adverse events. OBJECTIVES: (1) To assess the efficacy and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of adults with vascular dementia and other VCI. (2) To compare the effects of different cholinesterase inhibitors on cognition and adverse events, using network meta-analysis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched ALOIS, the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's register, MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), PsycINFO (OvidSP), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection (ISI Web of Science), LILACS (BIREME), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform on 19 August 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials in which donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine was compared with placebo or in which the drugs were compared with each other in adults with vascular dementia or other VCI (excluding cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL)). We included all drug doses and routes of administration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently identified eligible trials, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and applied the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence. The primary outcomes were cognition, clinical global impression, function (performance of activities of daily living), and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were serious adverse events, incidence of development of new dementia, behavioural disturbance, carer burden, institutionalisation, quality of life and death. For the pairwise analyses, we pooled outcome data at similar time points using random-effects methods. We also performed a network meta-analysis using Bayesian methods. MAIN RESULTS: We included eight trials (4373 participants) in the review. Three trials studied donepezil 5 mg or 10 mg daily (n= 2193); three trials studied rivastigmine at a maximum daily dose of 3 to 12 mg (n= 800); and two trials studied galantamine at a maximum daily dose of 16 to 24 mg (n= 1380). The trials included participants with possible or probable vascular dementia or cognitive impairment following stroke. Mean ages were between 72.2 and 73.9 years. All of the trials were at low or unclear risk of bias in all domains, and the evidence ranged from very low to high level of certainty. For cognition, the results showed that donepezil 5 mg improves cognition slightly, although the size of the effect is unlikely to be clinically important (mean difference (MD) -0.92 Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) points (range 0 to 70), 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.44 to -0.40; high-certainty evidence). Donepezil 10 mg (MD -2.21 ADAS-Cog points, 95% CI -3.07 to -1.35; moderate-certainty evidence) and galantamine 16 to 24 mg (MD -2.01 ADAS-Cog point, 95%CI -3.18 to -0.85; moderate-certainty evidence) probably also improve cognition, although the larger effect estimates still may not be clinically important. With low certainty, there may be little to no effect of rivastigmine 3 to 12 mg daily on cognition (MD 0.03 ADAS-Cog points, 95% CI -3.04 to 3.10; low-certainty evidence). Adverse events reported in the studies included nausea and/or vomiting, diarrhoea, dizziness, headache, and hypertension. The results showed that there was probably little to no difference between donepezil 5 mg and placebo in the number of adverse events (odds ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.58; moderate-certainty evidence), but there were slightly more adverse events with donepezil 10 mg than with placebo (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.15; high-certainty evidence). The effect of rivastigmine 3 to 12 mg on adverse events was very uncertain (OR 3.21, 95% CI 0.36 to 28.88; very low-certainty evidence). Galantamine 16 to 24 mg is probably associated with a slight excess of adverse events over placebo (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.43; moderate-certainty evidence). In the network meta-analysis (NMA), we included cognition to represent benefit, and adverse events to represent harm. All drugs ranked above placebo for cognition and below placebo for adverse events. We found donepezil 10 mg to rank first in terms of benefit, but third in terms of harms, when considering the network estimates and quality of evidence. Galantamine was ranked second in terms of both benefit and harm. Rivastigmine had the lowest ranking of the cholinesterase inhibitors in both benefit and harm NMA estimates, but this may reflect possibly inadequate doses received by some trial participants and small trial sample sizes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate- to high-certainty evidence that donepezil 5 mg, donepezil 10 mg, and galantamine have a slight beneficial effect on cognition in people with VCI, although the size of the change is unlikely to be clinically important. Donepezil 10 mg and galantamine 16 to 24 mg are probably associated with more adverse events than placebo. The evidence for rivastigmine was less certain. The data suggest that donepezil 10 mg has the greatest effect on cognition, but at the cost of adverse effects. The effect is modest, but in the absence of any other treatments, people living with VCI may still wish to consider the use of these agents. Further research into rivastigmine is needed, including the use of transdermal patches.

Rivastigmine Transdermal Patch Treatment for Moderate to Severe Cognitive Impairment in Veterans with Traumatic Brain Injury (RiVET Study): A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Cognitive impairment is common in veterans with histories of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Cholinergic deficits have been hypothesized as contributors to this impairment. We report the effects of cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine transdermal patch treatment in veterans with TBI and post-traumatic memory impairment. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 9.5 mg/24 h (10 cm2) rivastigmine patch in veterans of military conflicts with persistent moderate to severe memory impairment at least 12 weeks after TBI. This randomized, outpatient, double-blind, placebo-controlled 12-week trial with an exploratory double-blind phase of an additional 14 weeks was conducted at 5 VA Medical Centers, among veterans with closed, non-penetrating TBI who met or exceeded modified American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine criteria for mild TBI with verbal memory deficits, as assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, Revised (HVLT-R). Patients were randomized 1:1 to rivastigmine or matching placebo patches after a 1-week single-blind, placebo run-in phase. At randomization, patients received 4.6 mg/24 h rivastigmine patches or matching placebo increased to a 9.5 mg/24 h patch after 4 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the proportion of participants who had at least a five-word improvement on the HVLT-R Total Recall Index (Trials 1-3). A total of 3671 participants were pre-screened, of whom 257 (7.0%) were screened; 96 (37%) randomized, and 94 included in study analyses. Responder rates were 40.8% (20 of 49) and 51.1% (23 of 45) in the rivastigmine and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.41). A mixed-effect model including treatment, time, and treatment-by-time interaction indicated no significant difference in treatment effect over time between the groups (p = 0.24). Overall, there were no significant differences in changes for all secondary outcomes between the rivastigmine and placebo groups. The most commonly observed adverse events were application site reactions. This trial provides the largest sample to date of veterans with TBI and post-traumatic memory deficits enrolled in a pharmacological trial. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01670526.

Approach to Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease.

Cognitive dysfunction is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and predicts poor clinical outcomes. It is associated primarily with pathologic involvement of basal forebrain cholinergic and prefrontal dopaminergic systems. Impairments in executive functions, attention, and visuospatial abilities are its hallmark features with eventual involvement of memory and other domains. Subtle symptoms in the premotor and early phases of PD progress to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) which may be present at the time of diagnosis. Eventually, a large majority of PD patients develop dementia with advancing age and longer disease duration, which is usually accompanied by immobility, hallucinations/psychosis, and dysautonomia. Dopaminergic medications and deep brain stimulation help motor dysfunction, but may have potential cognitive side effects. Central acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, and possibly memantine, provide modest and temporary symptomatic relief for dementia, although there is no evidence-based treatment for MCI. There is no proven disease-modifying treatment for cognitive impairment in PD. The symptomatic and disease-modifying role of physical exercise, cognitive training, and neuromodulation on cognitive impairment in PD is under investigation. Multidisciplinary approaches to cognitive impairment with effective treatment of comorbidities, proper rehabilitation, and maintenance of good support systems in addition to pharmaceutical treatment may improve the quality of life of the patients and caregivers.

Comparative risk of cardiac arrhythmias associated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors used in treatment of dementias - A narrative review.

Donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine are the three acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs), out of a total of only four medications prescribed in the treatment of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and related dementias. These medications are known to be associated with bradycardia given their mechanism of action of increasing acetylcholine (ACh). However, in March 2015, donepezil was added to the CredibleMeds "known-risk" category, a list where medications have a documented risk for acquired long-QT syndrome (ALQTS) and torsades de pointes (TdP) - a malignant ventricular arrhythmia that is a different adverse event than bradycardia (and is not necessarily associated with ACh action). The purpose of this article is to review the three AChEIs, especially with regards to mechanistic differences that may explain why only donepezil poses this risk; several pharmacological mechanisms may explain why. However, from an empirical point-of-view, aside from some case-reports, only a limited number of studies have generated relevant information regarding AChEIs' and electrocardiogram findings; none have specifically compared donepezil against galantamine or rivastigmine for malignant arrhythmias such as TdP. Currently, the choice of one of the three AChEIs for treatment of AD symptoms is primarily dependent upon clinician and patient preference. However, clinicians should be aware of the potential increased risk associated with donepezil. There is a need to examine the comparative risk of malignant arrhythmias among AChEIs users in real-world practice; this may have important implications with regards to changes in AChEI prescribing patterns.

In Vitro and in Vivo Optimization of Phase Sensitive Smart Polymer for Controlled Delivery of Rivastigmine for Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.

PURPOSE: Alzheimer's disease is a neurodegenerative disorder, and most common form of dementia afflicting over 35 million people worldwide. Rivastigmine is a widely used therapeutic for ameliorating clinical manifestations of Alzheimer's disease. However, current treatments require frequent dosing either orally or via transdermal patch that lead to compliance issues and administration errors risking serious adverse effects. Our objective was to develop a smart polymer based delivery system for controlled release of rivastigmine over an extended period following a single subcutaneous injection. METHODS: Rivastigmine release was optimized by tailoring critical factors including polymer concentration, polymer composition, drug concentration, solvent composition, and drug hydrophobicity (rivastigmine tartrate vs base). Optimized in vitro formulation was evaluated in vivo for safety and efficacy. RESULTS: Formulation prepared using PLGA (50:50) at 5% w/v in 95:5 benzyl benzoate: benzoic acid demonstrated desirable controlled drug release characteristics in vitro. The formulation demonstrated sustained release of rivastigmine tartrate for 7 days in vivo with promising biocompatibility and acetylcholinesterase inhibition efficacy for 14 days. CONCLUSION: The results exemplify an easily injectable controlled release formulation of rivastigmine prepared using phase-sensitive smart polymer. The optimized formulation significantly increases the dosing interval, and can potentially improve patient compliance as well as quality of life of patients living with Alzheimer's disease.

An update on the utility and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of major neurocognitive disorders with a prevalence in the US of about 5.7 million in 2018. With the disease burden projected to increase dramatically in the coming years, it is imperative to review the current available treatment regimens for their safety and utility. The cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) have continued to play a pivotal role in managing the symptoms and possibly slowing the rate of progression of AD since 1993. Owing to their being a mainstay in the treatment of AD, the safety and efficacy of prescribing these drugs needs to be reviewed often, especially with the approval of new formulations and doses.Areas covered: The three ChEIs currently approved by the FDA are donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine. This article will review the safety and tolerability of these ChEIs and analyze the potential disease modifying properties of these drugs. The authors have reviewed all recent literature including review articles, meta-analyzes, clinical trials and more.Expert opinion: These ChEIs differ subtly in their mechanisms of action, in their tolerability and safety and FDA-approved indications. All are considered first-line, symptomatic treatments of the various phases of AD and may even have potentially disease-modifying effects.

Gel-based Microemulsion Design and Evaluation for Topical Application of Rivastigmine.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to design nanocarriers for the topical application of rivastigmine. METHODS: The effect of cosurfactants, hydrophilic gel and loading amount on the permeability of rivastigmine through rat skin was evaluated. Skin irritation tests and stability tests were performed to evaluate the utility of tested formulations. RESULTS: The results showed that the microemulsion formation and characteristics of drug-loaded formulations were related to many parameters of the components. When using microemulsion systems as a vehicle, the permeation rate remarkably increased about 13.2~24.3-fold and the lag time was significantly shortened from 24 h to 4.7 h. Formulations containing a cosurfactant of Diethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether (DEGBE) showed higher enhancement effect, while increasing the loading dose from 0.5% to 5% further increased the flux about 2.1-fold and shortened the lag time. CONCLUSION: The drug-loaded experimental formulation did not cause skin irritation and had good stability at 20ºC and 40ºC storage for at least 3 months. The result showed that gel-based microemulsion formulation could be a promising approach for topical administration.

Acute treatment of psychotic symptoms in a newly diagnosed Lewy body dementia patient with an accelerated titration schedule of rivastigmine and de-escalation of antipsychotics.

A 76-year-old man presented with complaints of increased confusion, visual hallucinations and decline in memory. He was admitted to the hospital and started on quetiapine 50 mg daily for symptom management. Shortly after, he was diagnosed with Lewy body dementia and started on rivastigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI), at 1.5 mg two times per day. The patient's symptoms continued to worsen and antipsychotics increased for aggressive behaviour. After he became physically aggressive, an extensive medication management review was conducted, prompting an alternative treatment strategy. The quetiapine dose was reduced from 150 mg daily to 12.5 mg daily, his rivastigmine was increased to 3 mg two times per day and all other antipsychotics were discontinued. The up-titration of his rivastigmine after 10 days of therapy was well tolerated with no adverse effects. He demonstrated a clear clinical response to optimised ChEI therapy and low dose quetiapine, showing improvements in alertness and functioning.

Risk of rhabdomyolysis with donepezil compared with rivastigmine or galantamine: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine are popular cholinesterase inhibitors used to manage the symptoms of Alzheimer disease and other dementias; regulatory agencies in several countries warn about a possible risk of rhabdomyolysis with donepezil, based on information from case reports. Our goal was to investigate the 30-day risk of admission to hospital with rhabdomyolysis associated with initiating donepezil versus other cholinesterase inhibitors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada, from 2002 to 2017. Participants were adults aged 66 years or older with a newly dispensed prescription for donepezil compared with rivastigmine or galantamine. The primary outcome was hospital admission with rhabdomyolysis (assessed using hospital diagnostic codes) within 30 days of a new prescription of a cholinesterase inhibitor. Odds ratios were estimated using logistic regression, with inverse probability of treatment weights calculated from propensity scores. RESULTS: The average age in our 2 groups was 81.1 years, and 61.4% of our population was female. Donepezil was associated with a higher risk of hospital admission with rhabdomyolysis compared with rivastigmine or galantamine (88 events in 152 300 patients [0.06%] v. 16 events in 68 053 patients [0.02%]; weighted odds ratio of 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52-3.22). Most hospital admissions with rhabdomyolysis after donepezil use were not severe, and no patient was treated with acute dialysis or mechanical ventilation. INTERPRETATION: Initiating donepezil is associated with a higher 30-day risk of admission to hospital with rhabdomyolysis compared with initiating rivastigmine or galantamine. The proportion of patients who develop severe rhabdomyolysis within 30 days of initiating donepezil is very low.

Rivastigmine does not alter cocaine-induced subjective effects or self-administration.

BACKGROUND: Acetylcholinergic (ACh) neurons interface with the mesolimbic dopamine pathway implicated in addiction, and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEis) have been shown to reduce the immediate effects of cocaine and amount used. Our study is the first to examine if the safe and low-interaction AChEi rivastigmine (riv) alters the subjective effects produced by cocaine administration. METHODS: Cocaine-dependent subjects were randomized to daily placebo, riv 3 mg, or riv 6 mg, administered inpatient for 10 days. On day 1 (pre-dose) and day 9, subjects received both IV cocaine 40 mg or placebo in a randomized order with subsequent serial assessments of visual analog scale (VAS) subjective effects and pharmacokinetic measurements. On day 10 all participants received one baseline dose of cocaine 20 mg with assessment of subjective effects, and were then able to purchase additional doses at 15 min intervals with study earnings. RESULTS: 40 subjects were randomized to placebo (n = 16), riv 3 mg (n = 13), or riv 6 mg (n = 12). All subjects completed the study and there were no demographic differences between treatment groups. Pre- and post- treatment, there were no significant pharmacokinetic differences (blood levels of cocaine, BE, EME) following cocaine administration. In a two-way ANOVA, IV cocaine significantly increased positive VAS category ratings compared to placebo, but rivastigmine treatment at either dose had no significant effect on any VAS category ratings. Similarly, there was no significant rivastigmine effect on any category in the day 10 cocaine administration, and no effect on number of subsequent doses participants purchased. CONCLUSION: Rivastigmine 3 or 6 mg had no significant effect on the subjective effects of cocaine after 9 days of treatment. This is an important finding as other drugs in the AChEi class (donepezil, Huperzine A) have produced significant results, but differ in their receptor specificity and PK parameters.

Optimization and characterization of rivastigmine nanolipid carrier loaded transdermal patches for the treatment of dementia.

The present study aimed to develop nanolipid carrier (NLC) loaded transdermal system of rivastigmine for bioavailability enhancement. NLC was optimized using Box-Behnken Design (BBD). Optimized formulation comprises oil (4% w/w), tween 80 (3% w/w) and span 80 (1.8% w/w) and was characterized. It was found that the formulation exhibit 134.60 ±â€¯15.10 nm, 0.286 ±â€¯0.041, -11.80 ±â€¯2.24 mV and 70.56 ±â€¯1.20% of mean size, polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential and entrapment efficiency, respectively. In vitro release studies showed there was more sustained release of drug from NLC loaded transdermal patches in comparison to Exelon® patch. Skin irritation studies proved the non-irritant nature of developed NLC based transdermal patch. From pharmacokinetic studies it was observed that there was increased Cmax and AUC0-72 in plasma treated with NLC loaded transdermal patches as compared to conventional patch. These experimental results indicate that NLC based transdermal patch could be utilized as a potential carrier for enhancing bioavailability of rivastigmine for the better treatment and management of dementia.

Patrones de uso de fármacos antidemencia en un grupo de pacientes de Colombia / Patterns of antidemential drug use in a group of patients from Colombia

Introducción. Los beneficios del manejo farmacológico con medicamentos antidemencia aún no están del todo demostrados, e incluso hay carencia de trabajos que describan su perfil de utilización. El presente trabajo buscó determinar los patrones de prescripción de fármacos antidemencia en una población de Colombia. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal. Mediante una base de datos sistematizada de 3,5 millones de afiliados al sistema de salud colombiano, se seleccionó a pacientes con dispensaciones ininterrumpidas de fármacos antidemencia entre agosto y octubre de 2016. Se analizaron variables sociodemográficas, farmacológicas y comedicaciones. Se estimaron los costes de las terapias a partir del precio de referencia de los medicamentos. Resultados. Se identificó a 8.372 pacientes con una edad media de 79,5 ± 8,7 años; el 65,3% (n = 5.471) fueron mujeres. El fármaco más utilizado fue la rivastigmina (69,6%), principalmente en presentación transdérmica, seguida de la memantina (31,4%). En general, la dosis media administrada por día fue inferior a la dosis diaria definida. Solamente 568 pacientes (6,7%) usaron terapia combinada. El 84,3% de los pacientes (n = 7.061) usó medicamentos para alguna comorbilidad y el 54,2% (n = 4.535) tenía otro neurofármaco. El coste por 1.000 habitantes/día de la rivastigmina fue de 3,47 dólares, y de la memantina, de 0,30 dólares. Conclusión. Los pacientes con medicamentos antidemencia los están empleando en dosis inferiores a las definidas y presentan una importante frecuencia de comorbilidades y comedicaciones

Introduction. The benefits of pharmacological therapy with anti-dementia drugs are not yet fully demonstrated and there is even a lack of publications describing their use profile. The present work sought to determine the prescription patterns of anti-dementia drugs in a Colombian population. Patients and methods. Descriptive cross-sectional study. Through a systematized database of 3.5 million affiliates to the Colombian health system, patients with uninterrupted dispensing of anti-dementia drugs between August-October/2016 were selected. Sociodemographic, pharmacological and comedication variables were analyzed. The costs of the therapies were estimated from the reference price of the medicines. Results. We identified 8372 patients with a mean age of 79.5 ± 8.7 years and 65.3% (n = 5471) were women. The most widely used medication was rivastigmine (69.6%), mainly in transdermal presentation, followed by memantine (31.4%). In general, the average dose administered per day was lower than the defined daily dose. Only 568 patients (6.7%) used combination therapy. 84.3% of patients (n = 7061) used some additional medication and 54.2% (n = 4535) had another neurologic medication. The cost per 1000 inhabitants/day of rivastigmine was 3.47 USD and for memantine 0.30 USD. Conclusion. Patients with anti-dementia drugs are using them at doses lower than those defined and they present an important frequency of comorbidities and comedications

A 48-Week, Multicenter, Open-Label, Observational Study Evaluating Oral Rivastigmine in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease in Taiwan.

INTRODUCTION: Rivastigmine is a cholinesterase inhibitor, approved for the treatment of mild-to-moderate dementia of Alzheimer's type. This study assessed the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of rivastigmine in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a real-world clinical setting in Taiwan. METHODS: This was a 48-week, single-arm, open-label, prospective, observational, post-marketing surveillance, multicenter study. The primary outcomes were change from baseline to week 48 in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores. One-year persistence to treatment, effect on activities of daily living, and incidence of adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 151 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 91 (60.26%) completed this study. At the end of the study, the mean rivastigmine dose received by the patients was 6.59 mg/day. At week 48, the changes in mean [standard deviation (SD)] MMSE and CDR scores in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population from baseline were - 1.00 (3.8; p = 0.0344) and 0.07 (0.29; p = 0.0403), respectively. The most frequently reported AEs by preferred term were dizziness (12.58%) and nausea (9.27%). No new or unexpected AEs were observed, and 30 (20.13%) patients in the ITT population were on rivastigmine therapy for 1 year without treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Despite the low 1-year persistence rate, rivastigmine showed a stabilizing effect on declining cognition in patients with mild-to-moderate AD in a real-world scenario. Rivastigmine is well tolerated at 6.0-9.0 mg/day with no unexpected safety concerns. FUNDING: Novartis Co. Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan.

Efficacy of rivastigmine transdermal therapy on low food intake in patients with Alzheimer's disease: The Attitude Towards Food Consumption in Alzheimer's Disease Patients Revive with Rivastigmine Effects study.

AIM: Most patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) experience poor food intake and/or loss of appetite, which accelerates cognitive impairment. Several reports have shown that rivastigmine improves appetite in AD patients. The present study investigated the efficacy of a rivastigmine transdermal patch for the treatment of low food intake in AD patients. METHODS: AD patients, recruited through the Attitude Towards Food Consumption in Alzheimer's Disease Patients Revive with Rivastigmine Effects study, were recognized as experiencing either a loss of appetite or poor food intake. A rivastigmine transdermal patch was administered to study participants for 16 weeks. Patients' food intake, bodyweight, Mini-Mental State Examination scores and any adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients with AD (age 86.2 ± 5.4 years) were examined. Their mean Mini-Mental State Examination score was 10.1 ± 7.0 at baseline. A significant increase in food intake amount (54.9 ± 98.0 g, P < 0.01) and food intake ratio (9.3% ± 17.6%, P < 0.01) was observed by week 1, improvements that were maintained throughout the study duration. A multiple linear regression analysis showed that no independent variables were significantly associated with changes in food intake amount or ratio. Patients in the higher Mini-Mental State Examination subgroup showed a trend change in food intake amount, although this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that a rivastigmine transdermal patch might improve poor food intake or loss of appetite in patients with AD. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 571-576.